There are tens of thousands of Democrats in New York who have done better--lawyers, educators, business people, civic leaders, college presidents. And I don't just mean in cities like New York City either. My home town of Waverly in the Southern Tier has dozens of people who would be more qualified to be a Senator than Caroline.
Of course, the story would be completely different if Caroline Kennedy were a Republican. The New York Times article notes that she does a pretty decent job of stonewalling the press.
But in brief interviews during the Democratic National Convention, and on “Meet the Press” after she had helped Mr. Obama vet his potential running mates, Ms. Kennedy easily deflected the few serious questions she was asked.That in itself would have been enough for the Republicans to consider Caroline Kennedy as vice-presidential or presidential timber. When McCain campaign manager Rick Davis first saw Sarah Palin on television, he was so impressed with her ability to stonewall that he promoted her for the VP nomination. If Caroline Kennedy was a Republican with Kennedy name recognition and real stonewalling chops, Davis would have nominated her for president.
3 comments:
I agree about Kennedy. I really wish they'd go for quality over star power.
What do you think about Jesse Jackson Jr.? I don't know a lot about him, but he's sure seems like a great guy. Looks like he has a lot of integrity and the ability to be a great senator.
Interesting about Jesse Jackson taking the information to the feds. I wonder why they didn't do anything with it.
With Caroline Kennedy you get both intellect and star power. She can win in 10 and her votes will reflect a progressive agenda. I've no objection to PROGRESSIVE political dynastys. If only there were, in addition to Kennedys, Roosevelts, Trumans, Johnsons (LBJ Johnsons), Clintons (read Chelsea), Jacksons, and when they're old enough, Obamas in the House, the Senate, Governor's Mansions, State Legislatures, etc...
Post a Comment